WEBLOG
>_

18.04.2025
In The News: Transgender Blues Or Nazi Jews?

Whilst the BBC could report on something important like the live streamed genocide of an entire indigenous population by a bunch of smug, privileged, settler-colonial land thieves, instead it decided yesterday to focus on the real main issue of the day which was: The Supreme Court's legal definition of what a women is. How much fucking tax payers' money did this horseshit cost? Do we really need a court ruling to define the goddamned obvious? Here's how you figure out what a women is: Ready? Were you born with a vagina? Did you also grow a pair of tits at some point in your teenage years? If the answer is yes, then you're a chick. If instead you've had a cock and balls since the day you were born, then you're a dude.

Got it? Good.

Now, some people might not feel like they were born in the right body, and hell, that's okay, I ain't judging. It happens. That's called being transgender, and that's okay. Really. Seriously. It is. In fact, it's okay to be whatever you want to be. That's called being human and the last time I checked, all humans were pretty fucked up in one way or another. Live and let live is what I say. Hell, back in my last hometown there was a trans woman who was hot as fuck. I mean seriously hot! Jeez, I'm almost embarrassed to admit this, but she was so hot even I'd consider sucking her cock, assuming she hadn't had it lopped off in a gender reassignment surgical procedure, in which case she'd just be like a regular chick, except super-hot without being bitchy and annoying.

But now that the Supreme Court has figured it all out from a legal definition standpoint, we've now got to worry about which toilet everyone is allowed to go to. You know the senario: you're at the pub, need to take a leak, but goddamnit, you've just had your cock surgically removed and are trying to fit in with all the women-folks. Which toilet do you use? Now, I'm sure we're going to debate in the media about this for the next ten or twenty years, but there's really only two options here: either you make a third toilet for the transgender people, or we all just grow the hell up and have unisex toilets. Is it really that difficult? What are the different sexes doing in there that requires them to have seperate toilets? Last I checked toilets were created to take a piss or have a dump in, maybe powder your nose if you're a girl, have a sneaky puff of your vape, or write some witty graffiti on the toilet wall: "John Wayne woz here" followed by "The hell I was!" That kinda shit.

Twenty years ago there was a fancy pub down the road from me that had a unisex toilet. It all seemed a bit too radical and forward thinking at the time, but once you got used to it, it was just a regular bog where you went to bleed the lizard or take a shit if you really had to (nobody likes going for a crap anywhere other than in their own toilet). In short: it was no big deal.

My point?

This is a non-story. An issue created by the powers that be to keep you distracted from the real news and the matters they don't want to confront or discuss. Like how Nazi Jews are now an actual thing (Zionism), and how no-one wants to criticise them out of fear of being labeled "antisemitic" even if these evil fucks are killing kids on a daily basis and starving & bombing an entire population.

So, spare me your First World toilet dilemma problem and lets talk about the value of life rather than its diversity, both of which I think is something to be respected rather than feared.

"But what about prisons? Where do all the trans criminals go?"

Erm, it's a prison. It's not meant to be nice. Try stay out of prison. Have you seen Prisoner: Cell Block H? Fuck being banged up with any of those chicks, regardless of which gender you identify as.

"But what about trans athletes? Where do they go?"

Simple, give them their own category. Hell, we have paralympics for people with missing limbs and shit, so why not have a translympics for people with missing cocks (or pretend ones or whatever... however it works)?